Marriage and Fiction: Reader, I married him…

The Last chapter of Jane Eyre begins with these four words, “Reader, I married him.” As if with marriage the narrator wished to close the story, which started when Jane was a ten-year old orphan living unhappily with her cruel aunt, Mrs. Reed, and spiteful cousins; Georgina, Eliza, and John. She later went through the deprivations and severity of Lowood boarding school for poor girls, run by the dreadful Mr. Brocklehurst, where she trained, and later worked as a teacher. When she was eighteen, she applied for a job as a governess at Thornfield Hall, where she met and fell in love with Mr. Rochester, who almost dishonoured her by preparing a bigamous marriage. He was already legally married to Bertha Mason, whom he had imprisoned in his attic. Bertha committed suicide, and Jane and Rochester were finally able to celebrate a lawful wedding, in the final chapter of the novel.

It was a Victorian convention to end novels in this way, indicating that virtue led to the stability and happiness which marriage represented. The problem here is that Mr. Rochester was neither virtuous nor stable, and every reader is aware of that. Whether you believe that this was the end of the story of Jane Eyre is, of course, up to the reader. This is what the narrator, Jane Eyre, a romantic and innocent twenty-year-old, thought would happen. But how reliable a narrator is Jane, the young, naïve woman who is blindly in love with Edward Rochester?

Readers have seen Edward Rochester through Jane Eyre’s eyes. She loved him in spite of his lies, and there were many of them. Rochester always denied being Adele’s father, and he insisted that he was unmarried, even in a church, as Richard Mason accused him of being betrothed to his sister. He blames everyone else for his problems; his father, his brother, Richard Mason, his first wife, and he even accuses Jane of bewitching him into loving her. Rochester is innocent in his own eyes, and he convinces Jane of his guiltlessness; this does not necessarily mean he convinces the reader. Readers make their own decisions.

Rochester is bad-tempered, conceited, and aggressive. He tries to humiliate Jane when she first arrives at Thornfield, and teases her mercilessly with Blanche Ingram, and his other guests. He reminds her constantly that she is not attractive, “You—poor and obscure, and small and plain as you are.” (Chapter XXIII) He even threatens Jane with these words, “Jane, I am not a gentle-tempered man—you forget that: I am not long-enduring; I am not cool and dispassionate. Out of pity to me and yourself, put your finger on my pulse, feel how it throbs, and—beware!” As a result of his violence she is forced to ask for God’s help, “I did what human beings do instinctively when they are driven to utter extremity—looked for aid to one higher than man: the words “God help me!” burst involuntarily from my lips.” (Chapter XXVII)

Jane does not finally tame him. He is rendered physically passive, after the accident due to partial blindness and a stumped arm, and emotionally sunk, because he has lost the two women who were sustaining his vanity and ego. When Jane finally returns, he recovers his physical and emotional strength, because he is now someone’s unconditional “master” once more. The question is: how long will Jane be able to continue with the idyllic life she imagines she will lead for the rest of her days? Is marriage the end of a story, or the beginning of another, greater adventure?

We can ask ourselves some questions in order to foresee how their relationship may well develop: Will Jane be content to spend the rest of her life as a recluse at Ferdean? Will Rochester be content to do the same after he recovers his sight and his health? What will happen once they have a family? Will Rochester relinquish his central role in her life in favour of a child or children? Are they really well suited? Do they have the same outlook on life? Does he have any consideration for his servants? Orphans? People in difficulty? Has he any religious beliefs, as she does? Does she like hunting and inconsequential social gatherings? Their conversation was lively while they were flirting, but now the conquest has been made and mundane daily matters will take over, how will “sir” react? How will the gentry of the area take to Jane? There is a large age-difference between them, what will happen when Rochester ages or dies and she is still relatively young?

Jane is the narrator and protagonist of Jane Eyre, but the novel ends when she is still a very young woman who has a whole life ahead of her. Jane Eyre is one of the greatest characters in literary history; her life cannot end with marriage to an egotistical, dishonest, and idle member of the Victorian gentry. I wanted more. Jane Eyre, the impressionable young bride, deserves a life of her own, so I imagined Jane Eyre Rochester, the woman, and wrote her story, twenty-two years after her marriage to Edward Rochester, in All Hallows at Eyre Hall,  because marriage is not the end of a fictional life; it is the beginning of another novel.

Can you think of any other ‘unfinished’ novels ending in marriages, which need to be continued?

Published by LucciaGray

Writer, blogger, teacher, reader and lover of words wherever they are. Author of The Eyre Hall Trilogy, the breathtaking sequel to Jane Eyre. Luccia lives in sunny Spain, but her heart's in Victorian London.

13 thoughts on “Marriage and Fiction: Reader, I married him…

  1. In this very simple line Jane tells the reader exactly how far she has come during the course of the novel and exactly who is in charge of her life. She is in charge……… she doesn’t say “we got married,” she says, “I married him.” She is no longer in a passive state; she was in an aggressive state.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Definitely. Jane achieves her aim: to marry the man she loves. She is determined and honest. She waited, and searched for him, and married him once he was free. It’s a great line. She wants the reader to participate in her happiness and achievement, by addressing him/her directly. Thanks for your comment 🙂


  2. What a marvellous analysis-cum-character assassination of the rugged hero and great introduction to your own novel. Lovely illustration of how our culture has changed to that marriage is no longer the end of the story for ambitious women, but the beginning.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for commenting. This idea was the spark of inspiration which led me to write my novel. Sorry about my treatment of Rochester, (I’m aware it will/has upset some of my readers) but, quite frankly, it’s long overdue. He had it coming! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  3. As I read your description, Luccia, I realized you were talking about an abuser. Not in the physical sense but definitely a psychological abuser. I recognize women were considered chattel in those days, but abuse did not have to be part of the equation. This could be a study in the literature of the time – but I’m sure it’s already been done!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m sure it was unfortunately often the case… Some feminist literary criticism has tackled this aspect… but not enough, and especially not enough mainstream scholars will even discuss these aspects.


  4. Could you tell me how does Rochester humiliate Jane when she arrives at Thornfield? Because I do not understand that…Besides, in my opinion, Max de Winter and the nameless his wife are the ones whose marriage will not be happy. it seems to me that even at the end of the story they cannot talk about things that upset them and I doubt that they have much incommon…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. There are examples in the post. R. is unpleasant and condescending to both Jane and Adele. It’s fine that you don’t agree. It’s just my opinion, which I support with evidence from the text, but literature isn’t maths, there isn’t only one interpretation, and the outcome is often unpredictable. Rebecca is another story, but I agree with you that the chances are they won’t be happy in the long term either. These Byronic heroes are usually difficult husbands 🙂 Thanks for commenting.


  5. So heroines should look for such husbands as Mr.Knightley,for example. But he’s such a boring character… It’s strange that Max de Winter is a hero at all.


    1. Life and literature have their differences! But I agree with you that some of the most well-behaved literary heroes are a little ‘boring’ from a fictional point of view:) Max, Rochester, and Heathcliff, for example are more famous, interesting and exciting from a fictional point of view… How far this may affect women’s delusions of being able to ‘change’ their misbehaving men for the better, and lead to real-life disasterous liasons is a matter of debate!


  6. It is a novel of its time, for sure, and even when women wrote of other types of heroines (like Louisa May Alcott did sometimes) they were either not published or published under other names. One wonders what would have happened to Darcy and Elizabeth Bennett too, although there have been reimaginings of Pride and Prejudice that tackle that (and in that novel it seems as if Darcy isn’t quite as hard as he seems to want to appear, and he’s brought down a peg or two). Although it’s not normally part of most adaptations to screen, I quite like the way in Wuthering Heights the new generations seem to work out the difficulties of their parents and have a more equal relationship by the end. Your novels sounds fabulous and I have it on my Kindle. I hope to get to read it soonish. (With regards to literary theory that looks at some of those aspects I quite like ‘The Madwoman in the Attic’ by Gilbert and Gubard (when checking I’ve just noticed there’s an updated version (after 30 years). Must try and have a look at that…:)

    Liked by 2 people

Thanks for reading, feel free to like, share and comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: