Was Jane Eyre Plain or Pretty?
Some readers of The Eyre Hall Trilogy have considered that my Jane Eyre is too beautiful, arguing that Charlotte Bronte drew an ugly, or at least plain young girl.
When I read (and reread) Jane Eyre, Jane is/was never ugly in my mind, and I have proof that she was never ugly in Charlotte Bronte’s mind either.
Jane Eyre had quite a few antagonists in her autobiography, some of which were also her direct enemies, and therefore described her negatively.
For instance, her Aunt Reed called her ‘deceitful’ and said she had a bad character, and the servants at her aunt’s house said she behaved like a ‘mad cat’.
Her cousins, Georgina and John, called her ‘impudent’, ‘rat’, and ‘thief’.
While Jane was at Lowood Institution, Mr. Brockelhurst called her a ‘liar’ and ‘evil’, however that doesn’t mean any of these descriptions were true. In fact we know there were plenty of liars in Jane Eyre, who seemed to revel in demeaning her, leading to her obvious lack of self-esteem throughout most of Jane Eyre.
We know Jane was honest, sensible, generous and intelligent.
When she arrived at Thornfield Hall, Mr. Rochester refered to her as ‘plain’ on more than once occasion.
Part of the misinterpretation comes from the use of the word ‘plain’ in the novel.The word ‘plain’ has led some readers to interpret that Jane was ugly, yet ‘plain’ does not mean ‘ugly’.
What does ‘plain’ mean in Jane Eyre?
Let’s look at a few examples:
- Plain as poor.
Mr. Brocklehurst’s daughter, Augusta, says of the girls at Lowood,
‘Oh, dear papa, how quiet and plain all the girls at Lowood look, with their hair combed behind their ears, and their long pinafores, and those little holland pockets outside their frocks—they are almost like poor people’s children!
Here plain clearly means that their clothes and hairstyle is simple and poor. Brocklehurst’s daughters were wearing curled hair with ribbons, and dresses with lace and trimmings. The girls at Lowood were ugly because they were plainly dressed.
In the following extract, Jane herself says she dresses plainly because she is poor,
I rose; I dressed myself with care: obliged to be plain— for I had no article of attire that was not made with extreme simplicity.
- Plain as honest and truthful.
Plain is also used in the novel to mean ‘unvarnished truth’ Mrs. Fairfax is described as addressing Jane with ‘plain friendliness’
When Jane Eyre arrived at Thornfield Hall, she was a poor, naïve, unworldly young girl, who had lived within the walls of Lowood institution for eight years. Jane was indeed poor and plain because she had no money and very little self-confidence or knowledge of the world.
When Mr. Rochester said she was plain, he meant it as ‘no frills’, simple, poor, and honest. He didn’t mean she was ugly.
Plain is used to describe her clothes, hair, etc. as simple, with no adornments.
Yet, when she first arrives at Eyre Hall, Rochester calls her a ‘nonnette’ which is a small gingerbread cake made of honey and usually orange marmalade. That’s hardly an ugly thing. It suggests reddish tinges to her hair, small, and sweet.
When Rochester says, in his famous marriage proposal,
‘You—poor and obscure, and small and plain as you are—I entreat to accept me as a husband…’
He is echoing her words, meaning he loves her just as she is. She’s not wealthy, or from a noble family, or stunningly dressed, as Blanche Ingram (in the picture below) was, but she is honest and unspoilt. He loves her the way she sees herself, not only as he sees her.
In fact, once Rochester has proposed, her self-worth has changed drastically. Jane calls herself beautiful. The following morning she says,
While arranging my hair, I looked at my face in the glass, and felt it was no longer plain: there was hope in its aspect and life in its colour; and my eyes seemed as if they had beheld the fount of fruition, and borrowed beams from the lustrous ripple.
Later, when she goes downstairs to speak to Mr. Rochester he says,
‘Jane, you look blooming, and smiling, and pretty,’ said he: ‘truly pretty this morning. Is this my pale, little elf? Is this my mustard-seed? This little sunny-faced girl with the dimpled cheek and rosy lips; the satin-smooth hazel hair, and the radiant hazel eyes?’ (I had green eyes, reader; but you must excuse the mistake: for him they were new- dyed, I suppose.)
Later, when Jane has fled from Thornfield Hall on discovering that Mr. Rochester is married, and that his wife is lodged in the attic above her room, she meets her cousins in Morton. While Jane is staying at Moore House with her cousins Mary, Diana, and St. John, she tells Diana,
‘And I am so plain, you see, Diana. We should never suit.’
Jane has once more lost her self-esteem. She is telling Diana that she is not worldly or sophisticated enough to be her cousin’s wife, but Diana replies,
‘Plain! You? Not at all. You are much too pretty, as well as too good, to be grilled alive in Calcutta.’
There is no doubt that Jane was a short and thin young girl, probably due to lack of nourishing food, in an Institution where many girls dies of sickness and malnutrition, but I also have no doubt that she would have grown into the beautiful, healthy, intelligent and confident woman, who appears in my novels.
In The Eyre Hall Trilogy, Jane has grown into a wealthy and self-assured woman, so she has the clothes, jewels, security, and intelligence to be beautiful. I have maintained her physical characteristics, she is short and slim, her eyes are still green, as she says they are in Jane Eyre, and her hair is auburn, as Rochester described it, too.
Jane is as beautiful in The Eyre Hall Trilogy as she was in Jane Eyre, if some readers didn’t capture her beauty that, it’s their problem, not mine or Charlotte Bronte’s!
Michael says of Jane while he is her valet at Eyre Hall in All Hallows at Eyre Hall:
I am in love with a lady who has lively green eyes, pale cream skin, rosy round cheeks, smooth wavy auburn hair and soft coral lips.
One of my favouriter actresses to play the part of my mature Mrs. Rochester, is Rachel Weisz.
My favourite description of my Jane Eyre, is found in Twelfth Night at Eyre Hall, when Charles Dickens visits Eyre Hall and gifts us with this eloquent description of the mature Jane Eyre, the woman I’m sure she would have become,
We sat drinking brandy after dinner by the fire. It was a restful moment after such an intense conversation. I examined my host. Jane’s pale complexion and delicate frame stood in stark contrast to her confident movements and assertive manner, which denoted a remarkable strength and serenity of character. Her flawless features fit perfectly in her heart–shaped face. Her dainty fingers and soft hands caressed her dress distractedly as she watched the fire. Her russet hair was tamed with several pretty hair clips, and her inquisitive green eyes held a gentle gleam when they rested on mine. She was one of those fortunate women who grow more beautiful as they age. Her voice was soft and melodious and her manner charming. It was a pleasure to be in her company.
So, Dear Reader, do you still think Jane Eyre was ugly?
You’ve convinced me but I’ll ask my brother – he’s sure to have an opinion…
LikeLiked by 1 person
And I’d love to know what he thinks!
LikeLike
I think he’s going to post
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you are right, in assuming that Jane wasn’t ugly or unattractive. Certainly, at the time Jane Eyre was written, the word plain meant unadorned as much as unattractive. (I use the OED as my source when finding out how words were used). I have always assumed that Jane was small and thin faced because of how she had been brought up, with nothing attractive in her clothing.
Even later in the story I am not sure how attractive she would have seemed to an outsider, as she is only ever described as pretty by those who loved her. I suspect she was one of those who you wouldn’t see her as immediately attractive, until she smiled, then she would eb transformed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fabulous, Gordon. Thank you for your knowledgeable opinion. Now the hard question. Imagine Jane Eyre 22 years after marrying Rochester. What would she be like?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it would depend on what her life had been like during her marriage to Rochester. If a happy marriage, she would have turned into a smiling middle-aged attractive woman. if her life had been hard, then whatever beauty she had would almost certainly have vanished.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, you are not sure Rochester would have behaved! I’m sure he wouldn’t have, but I think Jane would have coped with that and been resourceful and resilient enough to pull through and keep her good looks, do some social work and campaigning, and become a writer!
LikeLike
I love your insights and arguments for a plain Jane to have blossomed into a beautiful woman with the adornments and life denied in childhood. I’d agree with you on the green eyes only because I have hazel hair and hazel eyes (my mother used to claim my eyes matched my hair) but in certain moods or light my eyes shift to green. Hazel eyes do that! Great that Gordon responded, though I still think Jane was a beauty and not just to those who loved her. Of course, that’s at the heart of the story (beauty in perception) but you go the next level to even strangers seeing her beauty, thus they see the loved woman, not the unloved child.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder, and anyone who reads Jane Eyre can appreciate her beauty. Jane suffered a great deal in her early childhood and teenage years. She started to blossom at Thornfield and, after some more blows, finally achieved her dream of love and financial independence. She was a self-made woman, who was able to overcome her childhood traumas, and complex relationship with the highly strung and domineering Rochester. I can see her caring for others and persuing a career as a writer, after all Jane Eyre wrote her autobiography at an early age. I hate the way some films have portrayed her as a spineless whimp. She was anything but. Thanks for dropping by and commenting, Norah💖
LikeLiked by 1 person
i never believed she was ugly, just not pretty in the conventional sense. The choice of actresses to play Jane in the various movies seem to underscore this. When I read plain, I thought of her clothing and hair and initial demeanor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you didn’t think Jane was ugly! You’d be surprised how many people tell me I’ve made her more beautiful than she was. I just put her improved financial situation, intelligence, courage and self-esteem to good use over the years 🙂 In my novels Jane has a serene elegance and beauty, but the real, ‘stunning beauty’ in The Eyre Hall Trilogy is Annette, Bertha’s daughter. I’ll be posting about Annette, soon 🙂
LikeLike
“Charlotte was possessed of a remarkably complex character: she was indomitably honest, tenacious, stoic, full of integrity and determination and independence of thought, enthusiastic, passionate, and yet emotionally insecure, shy, sensitive, physically frail, secretly obsessed with her own ugliness — she was thin, short, and plain, with a reddish face, missing teeth and an overhanging brow, though friends speak of her lovely eyes and beautiful hair — and prone to psychosomatic illnesses”.
https://victorianweb.org/authors/bronte/cbronte/brontbio1.html
“She (Brontë) once told her sisters that they were wrong—even morally wrong—in making their heroines beautiful as a matter of course. They replied that it was impossible to make a heroine interesting on any other terms. Her answer was, ‘I will prove to you that you are wrong; I will show you a heroine as plain and as small as myself, who shall be as interesting as any of yours.'”- Elizabeth Gaskell, The Life of Charlotte Brontë (chapter XV)
Gaskell was a close friend of Bronte as far as I understand and wrote this in her biography. I’ve always assumed that the whole point of Jane Eyre is that Jane is not attractive. The servants in the opening chapters say that she is an unlovable toad, and that if she were more attractive she would be lovable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Lizzie,
Thank you for reading and commenting on my post.
I agree that according to the contemporary accounts you mention, Charlotte was considered ugly.
I also agree with you that it would seem (although she never said it herself in her numerous letters), that according to Mrs Gaskell, she deliberately did not want to have a traditionally beautiful heroine, as were Blanche Ingram or Jane’s cousin Georgina, but I don’t agree that she depicted, or wished to depict an ugly Jane.
I discuss the meaning of ‘plain’ amply in my post and give instances of people referring to Jane’s physical attributes in a positive light in the novel.
I also believe that Jane and Charlotte are completely different women, physically and emotionally. I have written another post on that topic.
Jane Eyre is a fictional character readers recreate in their imagination. I have an opinion and so do you. Some people will agree with your view, others with mine, and others will propose distinct re-imaginings of our beloved Jane. And that’s the beauty of art and literature, the reader or observer is free to interpret what he has seen in the picture or read in the novel.
I have read Jane Eyre with a fine toothcomb, taught and discussed the novel with undergraduates, and written numerous articles. That doesn’t mean I’m right, it just means that my opinion is well-informed, but it’s still a personal opinion, which can and should be disputed.
“Don’t believe me!” I used to tell my students (I’m retired now), read it for yourselves, investigate, and reach your own conclusions.
LikeLike